![]() I guess I'll dive in to Topaz Remask when the Fluid Mask demo runs out.Fluid Mask 3 Free Download free download without any fee or subscription. The Fluid Mask approach seems thoughtful and ambitious, yet I suspect that the content I usually work with is just too complicated, as an agnostic field of data, for time saving systems to achieve the results I am looking for. I am hoping to find a circumstance where Fluid Mask really impresses me as a special case time saver. I am going to spend some free time continuing with tutorials and the thirty day demo, but I think I am used to making much more precise masks using hand painted techniques. With the less nuanced preparation of the edges, which I seem to be constrained to with Fluid Mask's limited brush control, the result of Edge Blending seems crude where it needs to be subtle and insufficient where it needs to be pronounced. With Fluid Mask, the Edge Blending is an absolute necessity. The Edge Blending function in Fluid Mask seems nice, but when I use "Refine Edges" in Photoshop I have already prepared the edges with varying and appropriate degrees of hardness/softness with my brush selection choices so the global refinement of the edges is very much a refinement. I find the brush cursor (the over sized cross hair) and the brush edge hardness in Fluid Mask seems crude compared to what you can work with in Photoshop, but I find I need to use the brush cursor, as both a brush and as an eraser, to clean up in Fluid Mask as much as I rely on brush work in Photoshop, so the less effective brush control seems like a significant downside. It seems like it is a great idea but I get the impression that Photoshop has remarkably similar functionality hidden within an overtly different workflow. ![]() I do want to learn more about Fluid Masks seemingly unique Color Workspace selection interface. I ended up thinking that the clear sky examples I worked with were just as easily masked with Photoshop's built in tools. I watched a bunch of tutorials and gave Fluid Mask a good trial. There was a sale price on Fluid Mask that elapsed yesterday, and I let it pass because I spent some more time with it on some clear sky backgrounds that I found in my archive. Thank you to all for sharing your thoughts. Thanks in advance for sharing an opinion. I am wondering if anyone who has become competent with Fluid Mask has an opinion based on hindsight. ![]() I can imagine spending the money to continue to learn, but I am not sure if the time to master the application will be time well spent. I rarely have a masking circumstance that has a plain back ground so that furthers my opinion that I am stuck doing it the hand labor way, but I do remain curious about Fluid Mask. Periodically I consider Vertus Fluid Mask, but stumble through the tutorials with my own photo content and am left feeling that the much more laborious process I use is more effective for my work. I am not masking to replace skys or backgrounds, I usually mask to make subtle but separate sharpening, contrast, and light value layering effects. ![]() I use a lot of masking but have always opted to hand paint on a dedicated layer using a combination of Photoshop's brushes to paint and the "Refine Edges" process to further tune the mask. I have a question to pose: Is Vertus Fluid Mask 3 worth learning?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |